Family critical after man's death

The family of a man who died after a sugar factory explosion has said he would still be alive if more 'care and attention' had been paid to equipment. Robert Howe, 52, was showered with hot coals when a boiler exploded at British Sugar's Allscott factory on 2 March 2003. He died the following day from severe burns and multiple organ failure. An inquest jury recorded a verdict of accidental death and highlighted several failings over the boiler's maintenance. Mr Howe's family said the past five years had been 'long and distressing.' The jury's narrative verdict said corrosion of boiler pipes had gone unreported and criticised the training and supervision given to a man who fitted a misaligned soot blower. This had caused corrosion to a pipe which led to the explosion, the jury concluded. The corrosion on the pipe had been spotted when it was inspected in 2002, but this had not been reported. In a statement released though solicitors, his family said: 'The family feel that had there been more care and attention to prevent the failings leading up to this tragic incident, Mr Robert Howe, a British Sugar worker, would not have lost his life. The whole family have been devastated by the events surrounding Robert's death and would like to emphasise that it is impossible for them to put their feelings into words.' Mr Howe's daughter, Kristy Howe, 29, wept as the verdict was announced and cried 'yes' as the failure to shut down the boiler was included as an exacerbating factor. Martin Oversall, an inspector for the Health and Safety Executive (HSE), said after the inquest that inquiries into a possible prosecution were ongoing. 'The HSE liaised earlier with the family about this,' he said. 'This process will be completed as quickly as possible.' British Sugar has had other deaths and serious injuries at its facilities in recent years (Risks 214). Six months after Mr Howe's death, 40-year-old David Reed died in a fall at the same Allscott plant.

TUC welcomes DWP report on HSE

Commenting on the DWP Select Committee report on the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) today (Monday), TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: 'We welcome this far-reaching report on the work of the HSE.
'The report contains a number of positive recommendations and the committee endorsed all the key points raised by the TUC in its evidence, including increasing penalties for rogue employers who ignore legislation, and the importance of consultation and involvement of safety representatives.
'We are pleased that the Select Committee has focused on the appalling position of vulnerable migrant workers, who can find themselves at risk due to overtiredness from working long hours, may be denied sick pay so come into work when they are too ill to do so, and can lack the fluent English needed to grasp basic safety procedures at work. We hope that their concerns will be listened to and addressed.
'However, the theme that runs through the report is that the HSE is being asked to do too much with too little. The Government needs to address the very serious resource issues that this report raises.'

Report warns councils face chronic staff shortage

(21/04/08) UNISON says new research that shows councils will struggle to employ enough staff to run services in the next decade is a perfect illustration of why pay and conditions must be improved.The report from the New Local Government Network, published today, warns that a third of local government workers are due to retire within 10 years.Adding to the problem, it also found that “authorities are set to lose significantly higher proportions of senior managers over the next decade” compared to other areas of the public services.UNISON senior national officer Lucille Thirlby said: “This is not an issue for the future, but for the here and now.”While the report seemed only to focus on senior managers within local authorities, she said, “the problem is much deeper that.“While there are fewer graduates wanting a career in local government, this cannot have solely led to this crisis. It is pay and conditions at work that lead people to stay or go.”The report also shows that graduates often reject a career in local government because they perceive average council staff to be “definitely middle-aged, probably wearing glasses, slightly overweight … white, middle-class men”, who spend their lives focusing on “things like parking fines and what type of seat is going to be at the bus stop”. Ms Thirlby noted: “We are very concerned on the perception of local government, as it does not reflect that three-quarters of the workforce are women.“There is a job of work to be done by the Local Government Association and others in local government to promote local government for what it really is.”The report criticises many council management structures as “not currently fit-for-purpose” and calls on councils to be more “outward looking” when recruiting for posts.UNISON is backing the report’s call for greater support for middle managers.However, the union disagrees with two other recommendations: fixed-term contracts for management staff, and the introduction of a ‘transfer fee’ system, where councils would collect a cash reward if a worker they trained moved on to another authority.“Where is the equality in that approach?” Ms Thirlby asked. “We know that managers never have difficulty getting training, but other workers do.”And there were enough fixed-term contracts already, she said.

Union recommends rejection of 2.45% offer

(08/04/08) UNISON’s lay committee overseeing local government talks in England, Wales and Northern Ireland is consulting members on the employers’ final offer, under the local government group's pay consultation procedures, with a recommendation to reject.The offer, made made on 2 April. is worth 2.45%, plus an extra £100 for lower paid members – an increase of 3.3%The consultation will be carried out on the basis that – if members vote to reject the offer – they will need be prepared to take sustained and escalating strike action, starting with a two-day strike and escalating to more than two consecutive days of action, to get the employers back to the negotiating table.Branches will be strongly encouraged to carry out branch ballots and return the results to their regional offices by 7 May. The union’s NJC committee will meet again on 12 May to consider the outcome of the consultation.Materials for the ballot and the campaign are currently being prepared and a branch circular will sent to local government branches.

Employers come back with 2.45%

(02/04/08) Local government employers returned to the negotiating table today with a pay offer that would leave the lowest paid workers less well off than supermarket staff.The rise being offered is 2.45%, with £100 extra for those on the bottom three points on the pay scale – up on the initial 2.2% rejected by trade unions but still branded "hugely disappointing" by UNISON national secretary Heather Wakefield.The employers insisted that this is their final offer.The extra £100 a year on points 4, 5 and 6 of the pay scale would make the offer worth 3.3% to the lowest paid.But Ms Wakefield point out that "the bottom rate in Tesco is now £6.25 an hour, so highly skilled workers doing vital jobs in our public services are being paid less than supermarket workers."We have made it very clear that this was a very disappointing offer – below the level of CPI inflation let alone RPI."The pay talks affect more than one million local government and associated workers in England, Northern Ireland and Wales.Unions are claiming a pay rise of 6% or 50p an hour, whichever is the greater, which would give a minimum wage of £6.50 an hour.The 'catch up and match up' claim is intended to recoup losses from below-inflation awards for the past three years and cushion staff against inflation over the coming year.UNISON's NJC committee will meet next Tuesday to discuss the offer and the union's formal response.In Scotland the unions are taking soundings of members after employers responded to their rejection of an initial offer of 2.2%, 2.3% and 2.2% over three years by making a final offer of a 2.5% increase each year. The offer does not include a 'reopener' clause as yet, and does not approach the unions' claim of 5% or £1,000 for the first year. Trade union side secretary Dougie Black of UNISON commented: "It is clear that the employers are firm on their offer and any rejection will require a commitment to take serious industrial action."

Launch Event of the new society.

Wednesday 16th April 2008- 7pm - Morris Hall Shrewsbury (see opposite for location)

£3 admission fee - open to none members - to Book tickets call Kay or Barrie Thornton on 01691 623354 or secretary@marchesfabians.org.uk

Austin Mitchell MP will give a talk entitled:-

The Housing Disaster

Quote from Austin “Every previous Labour government has been proud of its housing record. The only records established in the last ten years have been in the lowness of the build totals for both private and public housing. The result is a housing crisis which we’re only now beginning to grapple with, and a growing strategy of affordable housing for the increasing numbers who can’t afford to buy. That makes it time to change our priorities, build public housing for rent and bring councils back into the housing game.”

The main speaker will followed by a local councillor who will give a local perspective on the issue. This will be followed by a debate and open discussion chaired by Alan Mosley (leader of the Shropshire County Labour Party).

Refreshment will be available.