Date set for UNISON NHS legal hearing
A legal hearing into the merits of, and permission for, a judicial review, will be heard on 13-14 of October, 2010, following an application made by UNISON, the UK's biggest union for health workers.UNISON lodged an application for judicial review against the Secretary of State for Health, over the lack of public consultation on the NHS White Paper - Equity and Excellence:Liberating the NHS.Karen Jennings, UNISON head of health, said:"UNISON believes we have a very strong case, and we look forward to putting our evidence before the court."The government's white paper outlines the biggest overhaul of the health service in its history. The government cannot just bulldoze ahead with sweeping changes to the NHS without asking people what they think - this public right to consultation is enshrined in law."
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
UNISON General secretary's speech to conference
Speaking to delegates at Labour Party Conference today (27 September), UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, said:“On 6th May our whole world changed. Last Saturday we elected our new leader, and today we begin the task of defending all that we hold dear. Our public services facing an attack, the like of which we’ve never seen. A dishonest coalition of vandals, bent on destruction. Using the financial crisis to plunder our welfare state - take a chainsaw to our public services.“Planning cuts on an unimaginable scale, our National Health Service, our schools system broken up. Local government to be handed over to powerful contractors. Big corporations cream off the profitable parts while vulnerable users and communities, the poor, left to fend for themselves.“And everything they do, justified by a tissue of lies: they’re saying it was labour’s over-spending that caused the deficit, they’re saying labour wasted money on public sector non-jobs featherbedded public sector workers. Gold-plated pensions. They’re setting private sector workers against public sector workers.“We have to challenge those lies. The truth is this isn’t about public versus private. It’s about haves against have-nots. The truth is it was public spending that prevented us falling into a deeper depression. The truth is it is this coalition’s cuts that will throw whole regions, and maybe the whole economy, back into recession.“And if you want to talk about ‘non-jobs’, instead of slandering NHS staff, teaching assistants, and community workers, what about the casino bankers? What about the hedge fund gamblers? What did they do to protect our country? What did they do to deserve the bonuses and bailouts they’ve had?“It is they who should be doing more for less. More for their country, less for themselves. Conference, we should be proud of our record, proud of the improvements made to public services. Yes, proud of the valuable jobs we created.“But we didn’t get everything right. We were at our best when we worked together. Social partnership, in schools, hospitals and many local authorities, delivered huge gains. But too often this was drowned out by the argument. Too many top-down reorganisations, wasting resources and sapping morale. “Why was it so hard to get our labour government to understand, that our members’ concerns about privatisation weren’t about dogma; they weren’t about resistance to change. We had a problem with privatisation, because we saw what it meant on the frontline: on hospital corridors, in school kitchens, in care homes, it means poverty pay and punishing hours, it means casualisation and understaffing, it means corners cut on training and investment and our members know it means a bad deal for the public.“We sent mixed messages about public services - ‘any willing provider’, PFI, privatising care services, eroding Labour’s support. If Labour seemed to have no faith in our own public services it’s little wonder that the wider public became confused.“That’s why we want to work with Ed to forge a new shared agenda for better public services. And we want to work with labour councillors to find alternatives to cut-price privatisation. Engaging and developing in-house staff to deliver more efficient and responsive services to the public. And it’s why we need to be clear in our opposition to this coalition’s attempt to tear down all that we have achieved.“It doesn’t mean being in favour of waste, or always defending the status quo. But the public need to know which side off the street we are on. They should be in no doubt that labour is on the side of ordinary families who want a national health service they can rely on, a good local school for their children, proper care for their older relatives.“Conference, we know this country faces tough choices but that means getting tough with those who have had it easy. So let’s ask those who can afford it to pay their share. Let’s see real action to stop the tax evasion and avoidance by the rich and let’s have a Robin Hood tax on the banks, to pay for the damage they’ve done. “Fairness is what our people are crying out for. Together we must show there is an alternative we must work with labour councillors to protect services and communities. No support for those who privatise. We must work to kick the Tories and Liberal Democrats out of councils next may. We must work with Ed to win back this country.“Trade unions and Labour, standing together. One movement standing up for the fairer Britain our people are crying out for. David Cameron, your honeymoon is over, Labour is back.”
Speaking to delegates at Labour Party Conference today (27 September), UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, said:“On 6th May our whole world changed. Last Saturday we elected our new leader, and today we begin the task of defending all that we hold dear. Our public services facing an attack, the like of which we’ve never seen. A dishonest coalition of vandals, bent on destruction. Using the financial crisis to plunder our welfare state - take a chainsaw to our public services.“Planning cuts on an unimaginable scale, our National Health Service, our schools system broken up. Local government to be handed over to powerful contractors. Big corporations cream off the profitable parts while vulnerable users and communities, the poor, left to fend for themselves.“And everything they do, justified by a tissue of lies: they’re saying it was labour’s over-spending that caused the deficit, they’re saying labour wasted money on public sector non-jobs featherbedded public sector workers. Gold-plated pensions. They’re setting private sector workers against public sector workers.“We have to challenge those lies. The truth is this isn’t about public versus private. It’s about haves against have-nots. The truth is it was public spending that prevented us falling into a deeper depression. The truth is it is this coalition’s cuts that will throw whole regions, and maybe the whole economy, back into recession.“And if you want to talk about ‘non-jobs’, instead of slandering NHS staff, teaching assistants, and community workers, what about the casino bankers? What about the hedge fund gamblers? What did they do to protect our country? What did they do to deserve the bonuses and bailouts they’ve had?“It is they who should be doing more for less. More for their country, less for themselves. Conference, we should be proud of our record, proud of the improvements made to public services. Yes, proud of the valuable jobs we created.“But we didn’t get everything right. We were at our best when we worked together. Social partnership, in schools, hospitals and many local authorities, delivered huge gains. But too often this was drowned out by the argument. Too many top-down reorganisations, wasting resources and sapping morale. “Why was it so hard to get our labour government to understand, that our members’ concerns about privatisation weren’t about dogma; they weren’t about resistance to change. We had a problem with privatisation, because we saw what it meant on the frontline: on hospital corridors, in school kitchens, in care homes, it means poverty pay and punishing hours, it means casualisation and understaffing, it means corners cut on training and investment and our members know it means a bad deal for the public.“We sent mixed messages about public services - ‘any willing provider’, PFI, privatising care services, eroding Labour’s support. If Labour seemed to have no faith in our own public services it’s little wonder that the wider public became confused.“That’s why we want to work with Ed to forge a new shared agenda for better public services. And we want to work with labour councillors to find alternatives to cut-price privatisation. Engaging and developing in-house staff to deliver more efficient and responsive services to the public. And it’s why we need to be clear in our opposition to this coalition’s attempt to tear down all that we have achieved.“It doesn’t mean being in favour of waste, or always defending the status quo. But the public need to know which side off the street we are on. They should be in no doubt that labour is on the side of ordinary families who want a national health service they can rely on, a good local school for their children, proper care for their older relatives.“Conference, we know this country faces tough choices but that means getting tough with those who have had it easy. So let’s ask those who can afford it to pay their share. Let’s see real action to stop the tax evasion and avoidance by the rich and let’s have a Robin Hood tax on the banks, to pay for the damage they’ve done. “Fairness is what our people are crying out for. Together we must show there is an alternative we must work with labour councillors to protect services and communities. No support for those who privatise. We must work to kick the Tories and Liberal Democrats out of councils next may. We must work with Ed to win back this country.“Trade unions and Labour, standing together. One movement standing up for the fairer Britain our people are crying out for. David Cameron, your honeymoon is over, Labour is back.”
Social workers send out SOS - Give us new contract so we can practice safely
Stressed out social workers are today sending out an SOS to MPs and the public to back their campaign for a new contract for social workers. The contract has been drawn up after UNISON, the UK's biggest public sector union, and leading social work journal Community Care, joined forces in support of social workers. Alarming new evidence about the effects of spiraling caseloads on social workers and their clients prompted the union and the magazine to act. Social workers want the government and their employers to sign up to the contract because they cannot practice safely if they can't give enough time and attention to the people who need their help.Recent research* by both UNISON and Community Care revealed a bad situation getting worse. Social workers are struggling to keep track of the rising numbers of cases. They are bogged down by too much bureaucracy and don't have workable IT and admin back-up. As part of the campaign, UNISON and Community Care will be launching an E-petition while social workers will be sending the contract to their local MPs to get their support, and using social media to get the message out to as many people as possible. Helga Pile, UNISON national officer for social workers, said: "Children at risk, young people in care, frail older people, mental health patients, and the terminally ill are just some of the people who suffer when social workers don't have time to deal with their cases properly. Leaving people's needs to escalate, costs more in the long run and can lead to terrible tragedies."We're taking this campaign out there because social workers want the government and their employers to provide the minimum conditions for safe practice. A manageable caseload, the right to have their professional concerns heard and acted upon, the right to a minimum level of professional supervision and to keep their skills up-to-date - these are basic requirements that social workers should be able to expect. They know better than anyone how badly things can go wrong when workloads spiral out of control."SOS - the contract social workers needIn order to practice safely, and effectively, social workers should have a new contract with the government and with employers, that gives them: 1. The right to a manageable workload with a reasonable number and mix of cases. In high risk areas like child protection, mental health and older people's teams, we believe the Government should publish a recognised benchmark that practitioners can use to raise the alarm when caseloads are becoming too high.2. The right to have time off or get paid to compensate when excess hours are worked. 3. The right to raise professional concerns when workloads become unmanageable to the highest level of their organisation, for example to an elected member, board member or trustee. 4. The right to a minimum of monthly professional supervision from a qualified social worker of at least one and a half hours and more frequently for newly qualified social workers. 5. The right to 10% of working time to be available for continuing professional development and related activities like reflective practice, mentoring colleagues, supporting students and peer support.6. The right to a functioning IT system and adequate administrative support so that social workers can use their time on activity that requires their expertise.7. The right to safe working practices, which address the high risks social workers are exposed to from lone working, threats and attacks.8. The right for support to deal with stress and traumatic cases.9. The right to management training and realistic limits on the numbers of social workers any one manager is expected to supervise.10. The right to a clear definition of respective roles between assistant practitioners and qualified social workers so that there is clarity about who is responsible for cases* Research by UNISON and Community Care has found that caseloads are rising. A recent poll of over 600 readers found that more than four-fifths (82%) said their caseload has increased over the past year. 90% of social workers said high caseloads were getting in the way of them practising good social work. In another poll, three-quarters of members said the time they had to spend with each client was not sufficient to meet their needs. OFSTED's national social work practitioner survey from July 2010 painted a similar picture.The serious case review into the death of Khyra Ishaq uncovered the fact that her social worker had 50 allocated cases.UNISON is the biggest union representing social workers, with more than 40,000 social worker members. Community Care is the leading print and on-line publication read by social work practitioners.
Stressed out social workers are today sending out an SOS to MPs and the public to back their campaign for a new contract for social workers. The contract has been drawn up after UNISON, the UK's biggest public sector union, and leading social work journal Community Care, joined forces in support of social workers. Alarming new evidence about the effects of spiraling caseloads on social workers and their clients prompted the union and the magazine to act. Social workers want the government and their employers to sign up to the contract because they cannot practice safely if they can't give enough time and attention to the people who need their help.Recent research* by both UNISON and Community Care revealed a bad situation getting worse. Social workers are struggling to keep track of the rising numbers of cases. They are bogged down by too much bureaucracy and don't have workable IT and admin back-up. As part of the campaign, UNISON and Community Care will be launching an E-petition while social workers will be sending the contract to their local MPs to get their support, and using social media to get the message out to as many people as possible. Helga Pile, UNISON national officer for social workers, said: "Children at risk, young people in care, frail older people, mental health patients, and the terminally ill are just some of the people who suffer when social workers don't have time to deal with their cases properly. Leaving people's needs to escalate, costs more in the long run and can lead to terrible tragedies."We're taking this campaign out there because social workers want the government and their employers to provide the minimum conditions for safe practice. A manageable caseload, the right to have their professional concerns heard and acted upon, the right to a minimum level of professional supervision and to keep their skills up-to-date - these are basic requirements that social workers should be able to expect. They know better than anyone how badly things can go wrong when workloads spiral out of control."SOS - the contract social workers needIn order to practice safely, and effectively, social workers should have a new contract with the government and with employers, that gives them: 1. The right to a manageable workload with a reasonable number and mix of cases. In high risk areas like child protection, mental health and older people's teams, we believe the Government should publish a recognised benchmark that practitioners can use to raise the alarm when caseloads are becoming too high.2. The right to have time off or get paid to compensate when excess hours are worked. 3. The right to raise professional concerns when workloads become unmanageable to the highest level of their organisation, for example to an elected member, board member or trustee. 4. The right to a minimum of monthly professional supervision from a qualified social worker of at least one and a half hours and more frequently for newly qualified social workers. 5. The right to 10% of working time to be available for continuing professional development and related activities like reflective practice, mentoring colleagues, supporting students and peer support.6. The right to a functioning IT system and adequate administrative support so that social workers can use their time on activity that requires their expertise.7. The right to safe working practices, which address the high risks social workers are exposed to from lone working, threats and attacks.8. The right for support to deal with stress and traumatic cases.9. The right to management training and realistic limits on the numbers of social workers any one manager is expected to supervise.10. The right to a clear definition of respective roles between assistant practitioners and qualified social workers so that there is clarity about who is responsible for cases* Research by UNISON and Community Care has found that caseloads are rising. A recent poll of over 600 readers found that more than four-fifths (82%) said their caseload has increased over the past year. 90% of social workers said high caseloads were getting in the way of them practising good social work. In another poll, three-quarters of members said the time they had to spend with each client was not sufficient to meet their needs. OFSTED's national social work practitioner survey from July 2010 painted a similar picture.The serious case review into the death of Khyra Ishaq uncovered the fact that her social worker had 50 allocated cases.UNISON is the biggest union representing social workers, with more than 40,000 social worker members. Community Care is the leading print and on-line publication read by social work practitioners.
Saturday, September 25, 2010
Labour Leader - UNISON Response
UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, has welcomed the election of Ed Miliband as Leader of the Labour Party, announced in Manchester today. He said:“Congratulations to Ed on being elected leader of the Labour Party. UNISON backed Ed Miliband because of the way he listened and understood the needs of ordinary working people. We look forward to working together to challenge the coalition government and its regressive cuts agenda. “Under Ed’s leadership, Labour must offer an alternative economic strategy, promoting growth and recovery, together with fairness. This means protecting the poor, the sick and the vulnerable from the fall-out of this banker’s recession. “Protecting public services, and defending them against sweeping privatisation, must be central to this vision of a fairer society. “As a priority, Ed must re-connect with Labour’s lost voters, including public sector workers, many of whom have been turned off in the past because they believed that Labour had deserted them.”
UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, has welcomed the election of Ed Miliband as Leader of the Labour Party, announced in Manchester today. He said:“Congratulations to Ed on being elected leader of the Labour Party. UNISON backed Ed Miliband because of the way he listened and understood the needs of ordinary working people. We look forward to working together to challenge the coalition government and its regressive cuts agenda. “Under Ed’s leadership, Labour must offer an alternative economic strategy, promoting growth and recovery, together with fairness. This means protecting the poor, the sick and the vulnerable from the fall-out of this banker’s recession. “Protecting public services, and defending them against sweeping privatisation, must be central to this vision of a fairer society. “As a priority, Ed must re-connect with Labour’s lost voters, including public sector workers, many of whom have been turned off in the past because they believed that Labour had deserted them.”
Friday, September 24, 2010
UNISON warns government that threats to axe school body could lead to strike action
UNISON will be consulting members on industrial action and demanding the government carry out an Equality Impact Assessment over leaked threats to axe the School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB).The UK’s largest public sector union is outraged at the possible removal of the body, which took years to set up. The body was designed to bring fairness and consistency to the pay of half a million workers in English schools, including teaching assistants, special needs staff, nursery nurses, school secretaries, caretakers, technicians and dinner ladies.Christina McAnea, UNISON’s Head of Education and lead negotiator, said: “This displays the utter contempt this coalition government has for low paid workers, trade unions and in particular for the staff in schools delivering essential education services. We have been asking them since May to talk to us about this. "They say publicly they want to maintain an education partnership with all the unions representing school staff, yet we hear this news through the media. "School support staff are predominantly low paid women who are committed and passionate about their job and this government demonstrates their utter contempt for them by refusing to even meet the unions to discuss this. “If these threats become a reality UNISON will consult its members on industrial action and demand that the government carry out an Equality Impact Assessment. “This news comes on top of a pay freeze this year, which the government wants to see imposed for a further 2 years. George Osborne and Danny Alexander make much of their pledge that those earning under £21,000 will get a flat rate increase of £250 for each year of the pay freeze, but this is nothing less than an outright lie as they will not guarantee this for school staff. If school staff aren’t public sector workers I don’t know who is. “Local Authorities are facing equal pay claims of hundreds of million pounds from school staff and the SSSNB was set up to help bring fairness and consistency as well as local flexibility into pay in schools. Now they face years and huge expense battling this out in courts.”
UNISON will be consulting members on industrial action and demanding the government carry out an Equality Impact Assessment over leaked threats to axe the School Support Staff Negotiating Body (SSSNB).The UK’s largest public sector union is outraged at the possible removal of the body, which took years to set up. The body was designed to bring fairness and consistency to the pay of half a million workers in English schools, including teaching assistants, special needs staff, nursery nurses, school secretaries, caretakers, technicians and dinner ladies.Christina McAnea, UNISON’s Head of Education and lead negotiator, said: “This displays the utter contempt this coalition government has for low paid workers, trade unions and in particular for the staff in schools delivering essential education services. We have been asking them since May to talk to us about this. "They say publicly they want to maintain an education partnership with all the unions representing school staff, yet we hear this news through the media. "School support staff are predominantly low paid women who are committed and passionate about their job and this government demonstrates their utter contempt for them by refusing to even meet the unions to discuss this. “If these threats become a reality UNISON will consult its members on industrial action and demand that the government carry out an Equality Impact Assessment. “This news comes on top of a pay freeze this year, which the government wants to see imposed for a further 2 years. George Osborne and Danny Alexander make much of their pledge that those earning under £21,000 will get a flat rate increase of £250 for each year of the pay freeze, but this is nothing less than an outright lie as they will not guarantee this for school staff. If school staff aren’t public sector workers I don’t know who is. “Local Authorities are facing equal pay claims of hundreds of million pounds from school staff and the SSSNB was set up to help bring fairness and consistency as well as local flexibility into pay in schools. Now they face years and huge expense battling this out in courts.”
Ken Livingstone Labour Mayoral Candidate - UNISON reaction
UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, today welcomed the selection of Ken Livingstone as Labour’s London Mayoral candidate for 2012. He said:“UNISON backed Ken for Mayor and I am delighted he has been selected to challenge Boris Johnson in the return match in 2012.“Ken has a great record in defending public services and improving the pay and living standards of low paid workers and we look forward to working with him. Ken’s drive and commitment to London and Londoners will be needed in the economic challenges that face the capital in the coming years.”
UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, today welcomed the selection of Ken Livingstone as Labour’s London Mayoral candidate for 2012. He said:“UNISON backed Ken for Mayor and I am delighted he has been selected to challenge Boris Johnson in the return match in 2012.“Ken has a great record in defending public services and improving the pay and living standards of low paid workers and we look forward to working with him. Ken’s drive and commitment to London and Londoners will be needed in the economic challenges that face the capital in the coming years.”
Sunday, September 19, 2010
Lib Dems ditch the poor along with election promises
Speaking at a TUC protest rally at Salthouse Dock in Liverpool during the Liberal Democrats Conference, Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON, the UK’s largest public service union, will say:“Who can trust the Liberal Democrats now? They have ditched the poor, the elderly and the vulnerable along with their election promises. Their thirst for power has led them to sell-out their own supporters.“They must face up to the responsibility, that their assaults on public sector workers, will see hundreds and thousands of people out of a job. The impact of those cuts on local people who rely on those services will be devastating.“Here is Liverpool, 36% people employed in the pubic sector, relying on those jobs to keep their families off the poverty line.“And we don’t swallow the myth that the private sector are there, ready and willing to pick up the slack. That they will be able to create jobs for all those people losing them. The opposite is true.“We know that the jobs of hundreds and thousands of private sector jobs hang by a thread, because they rely on the public sector.“They rely on the spending power of council workers in their local shops, hairdressers local cafes and restaurants. As councils up and down the country cut jobs, we will see our high street shops empty and boarded up. Local shop keepers losing a lifetimes work and the dream of running their own shop. Their life savings gone.“And what about local businesses with council or hospital contracts – everything from paper and pens to food, computers, hospital beds and equipment? Those jobs will be seriously hit by the Lib Dem cuts to the public sector. Another dream hitting the Lib Dem wall.“But the Lib Dems – just like their friends the Tories – have the blinkers on and will not look at the alternatives. They are risking a double dip recession because they would rather cut jobs than deal with the tax dodgers and the fat cat bankers still raking in their bonuses.“They would rather cut benefits to the poor than ask the rich to pay 50% tax on earnings over £100,000.“They would rather spend time hunting down every penny over-paid in child tax credit, than go looking for the billions hidden away in a tax haven somewhere.“And yes, we should have a Robin Hood tax – a tax on banking transactions that would raise as much as £30bn a year – so that those who got this country into a mess – help pay to get it out.“That is why we must unite to fight these cuts. In every village, town, city across the country - unions must help bring together those fighting for their communities and the services that the poorest, the elderly and most vulnerable rely on.”
Speaking at a TUC protest rally at Salthouse Dock in Liverpool during the Liberal Democrats Conference, Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON, the UK’s largest public service union, will say:“Who can trust the Liberal Democrats now? They have ditched the poor, the elderly and the vulnerable along with their election promises. Their thirst for power has led them to sell-out their own supporters.“They must face up to the responsibility, that their assaults on public sector workers, will see hundreds and thousands of people out of a job. The impact of those cuts on local people who rely on those services will be devastating.“Here is Liverpool, 36% people employed in the pubic sector, relying on those jobs to keep their families off the poverty line.“And we don’t swallow the myth that the private sector are there, ready and willing to pick up the slack. That they will be able to create jobs for all those people losing them. The opposite is true.“We know that the jobs of hundreds and thousands of private sector jobs hang by a thread, because they rely on the public sector.“They rely on the spending power of council workers in their local shops, hairdressers local cafes and restaurants. As councils up and down the country cut jobs, we will see our high street shops empty and boarded up. Local shop keepers losing a lifetimes work and the dream of running their own shop. Their life savings gone.“And what about local businesses with council or hospital contracts – everything from paper and pens to food, computers, hospital beds and equipment? Those jobs will be seriously hit by the Lib Dem cuts to the public sector. Another dream hitting the Lib Dem wall.“But the Lib Dems – just like their friends the Tories – have the blinkers on and will not look at the alternatives. They are risking a double dip recession because they would rather cut jobs than deal with the tax dodgers and the fat cat bankers still raking in their bonuses.“They would rather cut benefits to the poor than ask the rich to pay 50% tax on earnings over £100,000.“They would rather spend time hunting down every penny over-paid in child tax credit, than go looking for the billions hidden away in a tax haven somewhere.“And yes, we should have a Robin Hood tax – a tax on banking transactions that would raise as much as £30bn a year – so that those who got this country into a mess – help pay to get it out.“That is why we must unite to fight these cuts. In every village, town, city across the country - unions must help bring together those fighting for their communities and the services that the poorest, the elderly and most vulnerable rely on.”
Sunday, September 12, 2010
Friday, September 10, 2010
Pay freeze causing untold misery
Commenting on statistics showing that take home pay has increased by 1.3% - well below the level of inflation - Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON the UK’s largest public service union, said:“The squeeze on pay is adding to the country’s economic woes with consumer spending power and confidence plummeting. Increasingly we see empty and boarded up shops littering the nation’s high streets.“The pitiful 1.3% pay increase across the economy is bad enough, but for more than a million local government workers their pay is completely frozen this year. With inflation at 3.1% and with the increase in VAT and national insurance kicking in next March, the picture looks bleak.“Public sector workers face a further 2 year pay freeze which will cause untold hardship to working families. Unless this Government starts to think about the damage that a pay freeze will cause, we will see more hard working people losing their homes and falling into impossible levels of debt.”
Commenting on statistics showing that take home pay has increased by 1.3% - well below the level of inflation - Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON the UK’s largest public service union, said:“The squeeze on pay is adding to the country’s economic woes with consumer spending power and confidence plummeting. Increasingly we see empty and boarded up shops littering the nation’s high streets.“The pitiful 1.3% pay increase across the economy is bad enough, but for more than a million local government workers their pay is completely frozen this year. With inflation at 3.1% and with the increase in VAT and national insurance kicking in next March, the picture looks bleak.“Public sector workers face a further 2 year pay freeze which will cause untold hardship to working families. Unless this Government starts to think about the damage that a pay freeze will cause, we will see more hard working people losing their homes and falling into impossible levels of debt.”
UNISON, the UK’s largest public sector union,
Attacked the Taxpayer’s Alliance (TPA) for wasting millions of pounds of public money, by demanding answers from public bodies to spurious questions. The attack follows their latest line of questioning on union facility time to 1,200 public organisations. The union calculates answering would have cost taxpayers at least a million pounds as well as taking up valuable time and resources – equivalent to more than 100 nursery nurses, teaching assistants or home carers or 50 nurses or social workers.Far from costing taxpayers money, trade union involvement has a very positive impact on the workplace. Research commissioned by the Department for Business in 2007 suggested that effective and engaged union representation saves the public purse between £170m and £400m a year by improving retention, training take-up, health and safety, and dispute resolution; and as much as £3.6bn a year through general productivity gains.Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON, said:“The Taxpayer’s Alliance is digging up another tired old chestnut. Taxpayers expect their money to be spent providing services, not answering spurious questions from the TPA to prop up their own political interests“Attacking trade unions who work with employers to create an efficient, more motivated workplace is just plain daft. The TPA is not working for the taxpayer. The reality is they are Conservative funded and are costing taxpayers millions of pounds, and tying up valuable management time, for their own ends.“There are more than 6m public sector workers and all these staff have the right to be represented. If trade union stewards are going to represent staff properly, they need time away from their usual jobs to do it. What’s more, collective bargaining saves cash. If councils or the NHS had to negotiate individually with all their staff, they would be forced to spend a fortune on consultants or mediators. “Public services are facing savage cut backs and workers have a right to have their voices heard and rightly expect their union reps to be there to help them when they need them most. “Far from causing industrial strife, paid facility time has contributed to the lowest levels of strikes on record. In short - trade union facility time makes good business sense. The TPA question makes no sense.”
Attacked the Taxpayer’s Alliance (TPA) for wasting millions of pounds of public money, by demanding answers from public bodies to spurious questions. The attack follows their latest line of questioning on union facility time to 1,200 public organisations. The union calculates answering would have cost taxpayers at least a million pounds as well as taking up valuable time and resources – equivalent to more than 100 nursery nurses, teaching assistants or home carers or 50 nurses or social workers.Far from costing taxpayers money, trade union involvement has a very positive impact on the workplace. Research commissioned by the Department for Business in 2007 suggested that effective and engaged union representation saves the public purse between £170m and £400m a year by improving retention, training take-up, health and safety, and dispute resolution; and as much as £3.6bn a year through general productivity gains.Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON, said:“The Taxpayer’s Alliance is digging up another tired old chestnut. Taxpayers expect their money to be spent providing services, not answering spurious questions from the TPA to prop up their own political interests“Attacking trade unions who work with employers to create an efficient, more motivated workplace is just plain daft. The TPA is not working for the taxpayer. The reality is they are Conservative funded and are costing taxpayers millions of pounds, and tying up valuable management time, for their own ends.“There are more than 6m public sector workers and all these staff have the right to be represented. If trade union stewards are going to represent staff properly, they need time away from their usual jobs to do it. What’s more, collective bargaining saves cash. If councils or the NHS had to negotiate individually with all their staff, they would be forced to spend a fortune on consultants or mediators. “Public services are facing savage cut backs and workers have a right to have their voices heard and rightly expect their union reps to be there to help them when they need them most. “Far from causing industrial strife, paid facility time has contributed to the lowest levels of strikes on record. In short - trade union facility time makes good business sense. The TPA question makes no sense.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)