Public sector pension talks jeopardised by naïve playground tactics

UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, today rounded on Government ministers for putting public sector pension talks in “jeopardy” by their ”naïve tactics” and apparent lack of negotiating skills. And called on them to abandon the playground games and get serious.He said: “We entered into the scheme specific talks on public sector pensions in good faith and we genuinely believe we are making progress, albeit slowly. But these talks are being put in jeopardy by the crude and naïve tactics of Government ministers who don’t seem to understand the word negotiate.“ The government must take its responsibilities seriously, and stop treating these talks like some kind of playground game.“Let’s not forget that these talks are about real people, hard-working individuals who signed up to, and pay into, a pension scheme that is supposed to cushion them against poverty in old age. Extra contributions won’t go back into the pension schemes, but straight to the Treasury to pay off the country’s deficit – effectively a tax on public sector workers to pay for the bankers’ mess. That is totally unjust. “It is totally unhelpful to the progress of these talks to release their bargaining position as though it is set in stone. If it is set in stone, then there is no point in having a single further meeting.” The union insists that any changes should be based on evidence and not political ideology. Average pension in local government is £4,000, but for women its just £2,800 (£56 a week) and in health its just £7,500, and £3,000 for women. Members of those schemes pay in between 5.5% and 7.5% of their salaries to save for their retirement. If they did not save, they would end up on means-tested benefits at a cost to taxpayers.Both the local government and the health schemes are cash rich and were renegotiated a few years ago to make them sustainable and affordable – longevity costs would be paid by the employee not the employer.The union argues that making people pay more, work longer for a smaller pension is unnecessary, unjust and unworkable. People will leave the schemes, if they become too expensive, and they will collapse.

Southampton social care staff to strike

Over 450 UNISON and Unite members working in social care are set to strike on Wednesday 3 August as part of the continuing industrial action against pay cuts. The council had previously written to all staff informing them of their intention to sack them and rehire them on worse contracts.City-wide action so far has seen waste and recycling workers, street cleaners, library workers, Itchen toll bridge collectors, parking enforcement officers, contact supervisors (social care), vehicle mechanics, port health officers and building maintenance workers go on strike. Those on strike on Wednesday 3 August will be the whole of the safeguarding division and all of health and adult care apart from day services, home care, residential homes, meals on wheels and commissioning. Action on 3 August will begin with a rally at 11am in Guildhall Square. This will be followed at 12noon by a meeting for all social work staff. There will be picket lines at Marland House, Oakhill House, Herbert Collins House, Thomas Lewis House, Cannon Street offices and College Keep. On 4 August the City Council will be given seven days notice of areas in social work who will be on strike for a longer period. A further strike of all social work staff is planned for later in August.Strong support continues to be received by the branch from UNISON branches across the country. Regional manager Steve Brazier reported that the branch received a message of support and donation from the Shetland Islands UNISON branch as well as receiving an ongoing commitment from UNISON at a regional and national level to provide the financial resources needed to continue with the dispute. There will be a joint UNISON / Unite membership meeting on Wednesday 10 August at 12.30pm in Above Bar Church to decide the next steps in the campaign.

Lansley's surprise support for UNISON pensions campaign

UNISON’s campaign against the government’s pensions’ proposals got surprise backing this weekend from Health Secretary Andrew Lansley, after a letter he wrote to the Treasury was leaked to a national newspaper. In the letter, Andrew Lansley warns that the proposals are ‘inappropriate’ and ‘unrealistic’, and would hit women particularly hard. He reiterated one of the union’s big concerns, that putting contributions up would force people to leave the schemes and rely on benefits when they retire – storing up a massive bill for the taxpayer. Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, said: “Even Tory ministers are waking up to how unjust, unreasonable and unworkable their own party’s proposals for public sector pensions are. Ever since the government came up with these plans, UNISON has been warning that people will leave the schemes if they are forced to pay more in contributions. “Health workers and local government staff already pay between five and eight percent of their salary into their pension. Stuck on a pay freeze and with inflation high, it would be impossible for many to afford more. “Paying into the pension scheme is the best way for workers to save for their retirement – the alternative is relying on means-tested benefits - at huge cost to the public purse.“The attack on pensions has nothing to do with affordability – it is based on ideology. Independent studies have shown the schemes are affordable and sustainable for the long term. In the health scheme, £2 billion more goes in than out every year. The Treasury would use any increase in revenue to plug the deficit – it will not go towards pensions.”

Lack of private sector pensions will cost tax payer billions says UNISON

UNISON, the UK’s largest union, has called on the government to deal with the real pensions crisis - the alarming lack of private sector pension provision that will place a colossal burden onto the taxpayer. A shocking two-thirds of private sector employees – 15 million workers - are not in a workplace pension to which their employer contributes. This could mean they are forced to rely on benefit top ups paid for by the taxpayer when they retire. UNISON figures reveal that every worker locked out of saving for their retirement costs the taxpayer £15,000 – meaning a potential extra benefit bill running into hundreds of billions of pounds. The union is calling for decent pensions for all workers – in both public and private sectors. It also highlighted recent studies that have shown decisively that public sector schemes are affordable and sustainable for the long term. Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, said: “It is shocking that two thirds of private sector workers are not in a workplace pension to which their employer contributes. These companies are shirking their responsibilities to their workers, pushing the burden onto the taxpayer. For every worker locked out of saving for their retirement, the taxpayer could get stung for billions more in benefit payments. “But instead of dealing with skinflint employers, the government shamelessly uses the lack of private sector pensions as a stick to beat public sector workers with. The latest round of attacks on public sector pensions is based on myths and ideology. Research by independent experts such as the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS) and the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA) prove the schemes are affordable and sustainable for the long-term. “And the government’s plans to auto-enrole workers into the NEST scheme will not go far enough. Unless we bring all pensions up to a decent level, we are running the risk of condemning a generation of people into poverty in their retirement – and a huge burden on the taxpayer.” *The possible cost to the taxpayer is over £15,000 for each worker that reaches retirement with just the state pension to rely on. This is based on the following calculation:
• For a single person, the Guaranteed Credit element of the Pension Credit is £132.60 a week.
• According to the “Interim Life Tables” produced by National Statistics, a male aged 65 today could reasonably expect to live for another 17.5 years – i.e. to 82.5.
• The average weekly state pension in payment (i.e. Basic State Pension plus S2P etc) in 08/09 was £116 a week.
This means that if everything remained constant and a person reached SPA with no or very limited private pension savings and an “average” state pension , the cost to the taxpayer of paying Pension Credit at a rate of £16.60 a week for the next 17.5 years would be £15,106 (i.e. 16.60* 52) * 17.5.

Government statement on pensions - UNISON response

The Government’s statement, laid in the House of Commons yesterday, outlining its position on public sector pensions is merely that - it is not a statement of the trade union side position. Our position is outlined in a letter sent to Danny Alexander, on behalf of all unions by TUC General Secretary, Brendan Barber, and is copied below. All the unions and professional organisations are now in their relevant scheme specific talks to make sure that our pension rights are protected. Our aim is to get a final offer so that members can see whether or not their pension schemes will be maintained or reduced. We expect these talks to be serious and any proposed changes must be based on clear evidence and not simply an excuse to find money to pay off the country’s financial deficit.The TUC will be co-ordinating the timetable and the talks will take place over the coming months and are scheduled to conclude by the end of October. In the meantime, we are accelerating our planning of future industrial action strategy so that we can move quickly and effectively, should those talks fail.Brendan Barber’s letter to Danny Alexander Dear DannyThank you for your letter of today’s date setting out the Government's view on the state of play reached in our negotiations and proposing that our discussions should continue both in the central process and by opening up scheme by scheme discussions.As your letter reports in paragraph 3 a number of areas of agreement have been identified and we have agreed language on equality impacts, participation rates and opt outs, and scheme governance and administration. A number of practical issues arising from paragraph 11 on local government need further consideration and I will write to you separately on this.As you also know however significant differences remain on key issues and at this stage to avoid any risk of misunderstanding I need to make it clear that (contrary to the introduction to paragraph 12) we have not agreed to or accepted any of the Government’s objectives as described in your letter, or the change in indexation from RPI to CPI. Nevertheless, following a meeting of our PSLG, I am able to confirm that we are prepared to continue our discussions at central level and unions individually in each sector will be actively considering participating in scheme level talks in order to fully explore all the issues and to enable unions and their members to reach a judgement on whether agreement is possible or whether more unions will enter into dispute and plan industrial action. Yours sincerely

Shropshire Council could avoid pay cut

UNISON figures show that Shropshire Council has an alternative to sacking 6,500 of its staff and re-hiring them with a pay cut. The Conservative council has sent letters to all 6,500 of its staff saying that they will be dismissed on September 30 and re-hired the next day - if they agree to a 5.4% pay cut and changes to sick pay. Shropshire Council claims it needs to save £76m by 2013/14 and is demanding that £7m is found by workers taking a pay cut of 2.7%, from October 2011, and 2.7%, from October 2012. This is at a time when council workers have had their pay frozen for the last 2 years. The UKs largest union which is currently balloting members on industrial action has revealed an alternative approach the council should use to protect services and workers. Dave Prentis, UNISONs General Secretary, said: The council is letting hardworking council staff and the people who rely on vital local services take a hit with these cuts, when there is a viable alternative. Plans to force staff to accept another huge cut, or lose their jobs, will see many families struggle to put food on the table and keep a roof over their heads.Our plan would save the devastating impact of the pay cut - the council must not press on with plans to cut pay without considering our figures.UNISONs alternative budget for Shropshire: Shropshires council tax income grew by almost £1.3m this year (2011/12) - not because council tax went up but because there were more council taxpayers. However, Shropshire Council is assuming no growth in the taxbase between now and 2014/15.Shropshire is a new unitary authority and wants to equalise council tax levels downwards. UNISON has identified that it will cost £1.6m. A fairer approach would be for the council tax equalisation process to raise the same amount of money. The council thought it was going to get £1m from the New Homes Bonus. In fact it received nearly £1.8m, this and the extra money it will get from 2012 onwards, does not appear to be budgeted for.The council is assuming that it will freeze Council Tax until 2014/15. If Council Tax increased by just 1.5% per annum - less than 32p a week for 66% of council taxpayers - Shropshire would have an extra £5.5m in 2013/14.

11/07/2011
Southampton council cuts pay while piling £4.2m into reserves

Figures released by UNISON today (11 July) reveal that Southampton City Council is claiming it is being forced to impose a pay cut on its workforce due to a lack of resources. At the same time the council is telling the Government it expects to pile more than £4m into its reserves. The council told the Government in March that it expected its reserves to have risen by £4.2m from 1 April 2011, compared with the previous year. Today council workers are striking over plans to sack staff who refuse to accept inferior jobs and pay cuts.According to the statement of accounts, the council added £2.940m to reserves in 2008/9 and £4.533m in 2009/10. A leaked council report shows that the council plans to axe a quarter of the workforce, at an expense to taxpayers of £15m. Hundreds of Southampton workers have taken action over the last six weeks, including refuse collectors and social workers in response to the planned imposition of a pay cut. From today (11 July) port health officers will join the strike. They provide health protection within Southampton Port and Oil refinery, through inspection and certification of cruise liners, containers and oil tankers. Dave Prentis, UNISON’s General Secretary, said:“The council has painted a bleak picture to employees, at the same time as giving the Government figures showing they expect the reserves to rocket. “Pay cuts and job losses will pile misery on to thousands of council workers and their families, at a time of rising inflation. It is clear that these punitive measures are just not necessary.“We are calling for the council to put a stop to these savage cuts.”Every year local authorities are required to provide detailed information to the Department of Communities and Local Government about their budgets, which estimate the levels of their reserves.UNISON has examined the 2010 and 2011 RA returns supplied by Southampton Council, which show:· Estimated unallocated financial reserves increased by £2,326,000· Estimated earmarked other financial reserves increased by £1,870,000When Southampton City Council set its budget this year (2011/12) it was based on the assumption that the unallocated financial reserves were falling – the figures suggets a different picture. (Extract from the 2011/12 Southampton City Council Budget Report - ‘The original revenue estimates for 2010/11 assumed a general draw from balances of just under £3.5m. After reflecting the revised forecast position from Month 9, this draw reduces by £1.1m, to just under £2.4m’.)

Shropshire council sacks all staff

(06/07/2011) UNISON members in Shropshire are considering balloting for industrial action after the council sent letters to all 6,500 of its staff, sacking them and saying that it will re-hire them - if they agree to a pay cut.The council says that staff who do not agree to the moves will be dismissed without any compensation.The move came after talks between the union and the Conservative council failed to produce any agreement.UNISON spokesman Alan James told the BBC: "We are advising our members to write into the authority refusing the new contracts and do nothing with the proposals which have arrived through the letter box."We have some time on this and I think the authority has gone about this the wrong way."And he continued: "People are scared and intimidated by the tone of the letter and the way it's been delivered by the authority."

Clegg NHS speech - UNISON response

Commenting on a speech on NHS Reforms, made by Nick Clegg at University College London Hospital today, UNISON’s head of health, Christina McAnea, said:“Nick Clegg’s attempt to reassure people that any changes to the NHS will be in the best interests of patients, has not worked. A growing number of professionals are calling for the Health and Social Care Bill to be ditched and that, we believe, is the best option. “He is completely naïve to think that more competition won’t lead to a greater role for private companies. Companies who are chomping at the bit to start raking in cash from the health service. Once they get their teeth into the NHS they will destroy it.“During this so-called listening exercise the overwhelming majority of patients and staff have put forward their fears. The Government must listen to them, rather than the hand-picked few, who are set to benefit from reforms.“If the Bill goes back to Committee stage as a result of significant changes, Parliament will have a chance to scrutinise it in much more detail. In that case, reform plans already being pushed through should be stopped, as there is clearly no legislative mandate and none likely any time soon.“We will continue campaigning against the privatisation of our NHS and this destructive Bill.”

Sharon Shoesmith court appeal ruling- UNISON reaction

UNISON General Secretary, Dave Prentis, said:“This ruling will give a much-needed boost to social workers up and down the country who protect daily thousands of vulnerable children and adults. It should serve as a lesson that whipping up a campaign of vilification and hatred will never save a single child’s life. “The torture and killing of Baby Peter Connolly at the hands of his mother and carers rightly horrified and angered us all. It is right when something goes so tragically wrong that we as a society question what went wrong, how it happened and how to prevent it happening again. “But, we as a society must accept that if we are to place such enormous burdens on social workers and other child protection professionals, we must support them and make sure they have adequate resources. “Social work teams continue to operate with high turnover, high vacancy rates and high caseloads. And the situation is unlikely to improve in the foreseeable future with local authorities facing huge funding cuts.”

Clegg challenge on Monitor - UNISON response

Commenting on Nick Clegg’s call to remove the role of economic regulator from the remit of Monitor, Christina McAnea, UNISON’s head of health, said:“Nick Clegg has echoed what UNISON has been saying all along - that collaboration, not competition, needs to be the driving force behind the NHS if we are to deliver the best care for patients. “UNISON believes this is a step in the right direction, but Mr Clegg’s demands on his Government colleagues need to go further if we are to prevent a further dismantling of the health service and private companies profiting from patients. “The Government needs to listen to the overwhelming majority of patients and staff who oppose their plans and not just listen to the hand-picked few who have taken part in their listening exercise.”

Inflation figures- UNISON response

UNISON, the UK’s largest union, is calling on the government to ditch its failed economic strategy and come up with a plan B. Today’s inflation figures mean misery for hardworking families, said the union, who are being hit from all sides by rising prices, low pay, and a pensions hike for public sector workers looming large. Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, said: “This strategy is clearly failing. The government must come up with a plan B. It’s a constant drum beat of misery for hardworking families. They are being hit with frozen pay and rising prices. Public sector workers are also facing having to pay an extra 50% for their pensions. “Today’s fractional fall in retail price inflation will not relieve the pain of family budgets. We know many low paid workers, for example care and health care assistants, already struggle with heavy debt. Many are cutting back on spending on food and things for their children – they are already at rock bottom. “Clearly we are not all in this together. Whilst public sector workers pay with their livelihoods and living standards, the bankers are still getting mega pay rises and big bonuses.”

Hypocritical Tories still relying on PFI

A new report by UNISON, the UK’s largest union, released today (16 May), reveals that, despite heavily criticising the Private Finance Initiative (PFI) in opposition, the Tories are relying on it in power.However, the credit crunch means that the business case for PFI is weaker than ever; a bad deal for the taxpayer has just got a lot worse.In practice, the Tories are not only expanding PFI, but rejecting new, cheaper funding models. On the same day that a huge PFI hospital was signed off in Liverpool, the government rejected plans for a hospital on Teeside, funded under a new procurement model.UNISON, a heavy critic of PFI under Labour and the Tories, is calling on the government to finally ditch PFI, and make projects cheaper by funding them publicly.Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, said:“Despite criticising PFI in opposition, the Tories have pushed it forward in power, signing off new projects worth more than £6 billion.“This is a chronic waste of public money. In the post credit crunch finance markets, the cost of borrowing has shot up, making the case for PFI weaker than ever. Projects searching for finance are now at the mercy of the banking sector, which is exploiting its monopoly position, even though PFI projects have not got any riskier. “Our analysis proves that Government borrowing from capital markets would be far more cost-effective, saving hundreds of millions on one hospital alone. And as cuts hit communities, and hospitals and schools shed jobs and wards, the case for more efficient ways of funding major public building projects gathers pace. “Tory efforts to tackle the obscene profits made by PFI companies are a sham. In practice, the government is rejecting new finance models, exchanging very short-term gain, for longer-term pain.”The reports main points:- Despite criticising PFI in opposition and in government, the coalition has a huge PFI programme in operation with a capital value of £6.9 bn, covering more than 60 projects. The cost of this will increase as the projects reach the procurement stage.- The off balance-sheet status of PFI is still the main driver, especially in the face of massive public spending cuts.- However, the case for PFI is weaker than ever. The cost of PFI has risen astronomically following the financial crisis. PFI is at the mercy of the banking sector which has exploited its near monopoly position to raise the cost of finance, despite there being no change in the risk profile of projects.- The gap between the rate at which government and the private sector can borrow has widened dramatically, shown on page 11 of the report, tracing back this gap since Jan 2008. For example, the overall rate of return projected on the Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen PFI scheme is about 8.5%, compared to a current long term gilt rate of about 4%. Using the current gilt rate to discount the projected returns to investors on this scheme shows the cost of private finance currently an additional £160 million in net present cost (NPC) terms.- The case for public funding has strengthened. The report puts forward other potential models, such as gain sharing from equity sales and from maintenance over-spend as more cost efficient options. Case studies in the report include:- The Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University hospital on Merseyside is one of the largest PFI projects to be tendered. The total cost of the scheme is £1.24bn and would have been £733m under conventional procurement (p10).- On the same day as the Liverpool hospital was approved, the coalition government rejected a new procurement model on Teesside. The hospital in Hartlepool would have used 91% public finance and 9% equity - the latter to take on construction risk. A much smaller PFI scheme is now being planned.

Cameron speech on NHS reforms - UNISON response

Commenting on David Cameron’s speech on the Health and Social Care Bill, at Ealing Hospital, in London, today (16 May), Christina McAnea, Head of Health at UNISON, which represents more than 450,000 health workers, said:“David Cameron is taking the ‘national’ out of the health service and turning it into a fragmented, money-spinning operation. “The Prime Minister is using extreme examples to paint an untrue picture. He admits the NHS is providing the best service it has ever done, with reports saying it is the most efficient and equitable health system. “Cameron’s call to crack down on waste in the NHS is a smokescreen for a move to a wholesale market, which opens the NHS up to privatisation. The real waste is the time spent on the fatally flawed reforms, which will force NHS patients to the back of a very long queue.“He talks about having more choice and protecting budgets, but health workers are seeing their jobs axed and wards, services and even entire hospitals lost without any arrangements to protect continuity of patient care.“Plans to move to any willing or qualified provider will cause instability and waste and lead to less patient choice in the long term. The market approach will result in a huge hike in transaction costs and form-filling. The time that doctors and nurses should be spending on caring for patients will be diverted away to this type of administration and managers will spend more of their time making sure their practices are not anti-competitive, rather than trying to save the NHS money. “During the so-called Listening Exercise, the Prime Minister preferred the ravings of people like KPMG’s Mark Britnell, who wants to see a move away from a comprehensive service, over listening to the outcry among patients, public, staff, health experts, charities and health economists.“There is a huge risk involved in ploughing ahead with these drastic NHS changes, when we know it isn’t necessary. The Government must concentrate on dropping this deadweight Bill.”

just Credit Union Ltd

Any one living or working in Shropshire can join just Credit Union Ltd. Many of the larger employers will now do payroll deductions this makes it incredibly easy to save and borrow and you will not miss it. just Credit Union Ltd is registered with the FSA and loans and savings are in most cases covered by free life insurance.

To join call 01743 25 23 25

UNISON survey reveals careers meltdown

A survey by UNISON, the UK’s largest public service union, reveals a desperate picture of the careers service for young people in England heading for meltdown. A staggering 97.3% of local authorities are set to make cuts to Connexions services this year*. Some areas of the country will see their careers service close down completely, with up to 8000 advisers set to lose their jobs nationwide. The survey also shows that some local authorities are flouting their statutory duties to provide careers guidance**, with 50% rated as poor in terms of compliance with statutory duties. This spells danger for the government’s ultimate aim of establishing an All Age Careers Service by 2012, which will be hindered by a lack of transition planning, and the huge drain of expertise out of the careers service, as well trained Connexions advisers lose their jobs. Dave Prentis, UNISON General Secretary, said: “Youth unemployment has hit a record high, with more than one million young people out of work. But all across the country, the Connexions advisers with the expertise to give young people the help they need, are losing their jobs – this makes no sense.“Local authorities have a duty to provide careers services – but these cuts mean many are flouting their responsibilities to young people. The government says it wants to set up an all age careers service by 2012, but young people need help now. The all age service will ultimately suffer from this brain drain, as well-trained Connexions advisers lose their jobs in their droves.“We are calling on the government to stand by young people in their hour of greatest need, by showing their support for the Connexions service. Ministers urgently need to reveal the careers budget for schools and instruct local authorities to keep services running, pending transition to the new service.” The UNISON survey coincides with the Tory-led Education Bill, which lays plans for the all age careers service, currently making its way through parliament. Amendments to protect the careers service have been laid by MPs to be debated at Report Stage (May 11th) in the House of Commons.Key findings from UNISON Branch Survey*Is your local authority making cuts to careers services? In 2008/09 – 49.3% made cuts to careers servicesIn 2009/10 – 57.3% made cuts to careers servicesIn 2010/11 – 97.3% are making cuts to careers services **How effective is your local authority in keeping up with their statutory duty to give careers guidance? Effective – 24.4%Fair – 28.8%Poor – 50% Regional examples Connexions Cheshire & Warrington - the number of careers advisors, community advisors and youth workers in each area has been cut in half. East Sussex – the whole service is set to close in August 2011.Essex - No one-to-one advice now available. The service will play a consultancy role, with only four people to cover NEET advice for the whole of Essex. Halton, Knowsley, Liverpool, Sefton, Wirral – in all these areas, cuts will see the end of school careers guidance services.In Lewisham there will be no Connexions service for young people. The replacement service will only target those deemed most in need; i.e. those NEET for 20 weeks or more and only those young people in schools who are statemented.

Survey reveals life in the NHS under the Tories

On the day that nurses and the public should be celebrating Nurses Day (12 May), a shocking survey of more that 2,000 nurses and midwives, paints a bleak picture of life in the NHS since the Tories came to power a year ago. The UNISON survey underlines the effect of uncertainty caused by the Health and Social Care Bill and the impact on the frontline of the Government’s demand for £20bn in efficiency savings.Three quarters of nursing staff said that the number of patients they have treated has gone up, at the same time as 60% reported a drop in staff numbers. This damaging scenario led to a shocking 64% reporting that safety and patient care is being undermined. Staff morale has been hit with only a quarter prepared to recommend nursing as a profession.The vast majority (78%) said that their employer was making cuts, with over a third reporting redundancies.Gail Adams, UNISON Head of Nursing, said:“The results of this damning survey are both sad and shocking. Nurses and midwives see first hand the damage that the Government’s cuts are inflicting on patient care, so it is perhaps not surprising that 65% say they have considered leaving the NHS. However, nurses are clearly angry at the impact on patients, with 57% saying they would be prepared to take industrial action if patient care is compromised.“The Health and Social Care Bill is a dangerous experiment and must be dropped. NHS staff have always been prepared to move and modernise, but this is the wrong bill, at the wrong time.“The demand for £20bn in efficiency savings is leading to more patients being cared for by less staff, with trusts forced into making front-line cuts. Some hospitals are now closing wards because of the squeeze on finances and that means patients are waiting longer. This Government is turning the clock back on patient care in the NHS.”Additional Survey results · More than a third (36%) of nurses and midwives had experienced redundancies in their organisation.· 67% said the cuts had adversely affected their health and 69% their family life.· A massive 88% said that their workload had increased in the last year.· 81% ranked caring for patients as being the best aspect of their work

Department of Health: NHS Modernisation – Listening Exercise
UNISON response, May 2011

Executive summary

UNISON remains fundamentally opposed to the government’s plans to bring about a massive top-down structural reorganisation of the NHS that favours markets and competition over integration and cooperation. The union’s key concerns are laid out below:

· Government plans represent a move to wholesale competition. This will undermine attempts to provide more integrated care both with the NHS and between health and social care. The application of competition law means the NHS is likely to become increasingly mired in wasteful litigation.
· The NHS will become increasingly subject to European competition law, meaning that instead of devolving responsibility to the local level, government plans will permit the EU a greater say in the way the NHS is organised.
· The full-blooded market system will allow services, wards or even entire hospitals to be lost with insufficient contingency arrangements to protect continuity of care for patients.
· The regulatory system is insufficiently robust to deal with the new provider landscape.
· Changes are needed to the Department of Health’s Operating Framework to rule price competition out completely, and the regulator Monitor must be forced to toe this line.
· The move to Any Willing / Qualified Provider will lead to instability and waste. It could even lead to less choice for patients in the longer term. UNISON supports a return to the previous model in which the NHS was the “preferred provider”.
· Plans to undermine NICE and bring about “medication tourism” will increase health inequalities and threaten value for money.
· The government’s plans are riddled with conflicts of interest and undermine the accountability of the health service to patients, public and Parliament. Most significantly, the Secretary of State should not be able to abrogate responsibility for the NHS. And handing responsibility for charges to commissioning consortia opens up the prospect of more widespread charging for services or top-up fees.
· Health and Wellbeing Boards need to have greater democratic involvement and need stronger powers. The plans for local HealthWatch also need strengthening.
· Government plans for education and training will lead to a loss of strategic planning and will undermine the ability of the system to respond effectively to changing demands.
· Separating out the commissioning of pre- and post- registration courses poses a significant risks to the effective way in which workforce planning currently operates.
· There is a need for substantial extra training for those visiting health and care providers.
· There is a need to retain national workforce structures for terms and conditions, for pay and bargaining, and for training and education.
· The abolition of the private patient income cap mean that some foundation trusts will prioritise those that pay for their care over NHS patients, who will find themselves waiting longer for operations and treatment.
· Reassurances about the need for foundation trusts to reinvest their private patient income in improving NHS services have been inadequate. Plans for foundation trusts to keep separate accounts listing their private patient income and their NHS income are so far only referred to in the Bill’s supporting documents, not in the actual legislation itself.
· For social workers, the right of appeal will in future be much narrower and less responsive to the complexities of social work cases. Pursuing an appeal will become more expensive and risky. The current Care Standards Tribunal system has proved itself to be accessible, efficient and cost effective in ensuring fair outcomes for social workers.

Interest rates held-UNISON reaction

Commenting on interest rates being held at 0.5%, Dave Prentis, General Secretary of UNISON, said:“The Bank of England has made the right decision by keeping interest rates low but inflation is hitting people hard. “The vast majority of UNISON members have not had a pay rise for two years and rising inflation is what is hitting families hard. The price of everyday goods such as food and fuel are going up and just making ends meet is a real struggle.“However, interest rates aside, the Government must re-think its damaging cuts strategy and concentrate on stimulating growth to preserve and create much needed jobs.”

Labour: The Party of the NHS

• The National Health Service is the Labour Party’s greatest achievement. We created it, we
saved it, we value it and we will always support it.
• In 1997 the NHS was suffering from years of neglect and underfunding. With sustained
investment and reform, Labour turned it into a high-quality service for patients, at the heart of
which is a core value: care provided on the basis of need, not of ability to pay.
• Under the Tories, the NHS was neglected:
• Between 1979 and 1997, inpatient waiting lists went up by over 400,000.
• In 1997, 284,000 patients were waiting for over six months for their operations. In
1995, the Tories introduced a waiting time target of 18 months – and they failed to
meet it.
• In 1997, just 63% of people with suspected cancer were seen by a specialist within
two weeks of referral.
• In 1997, half the NHS estate was older than the NHS itself, with buildings dating from
before 1948.
• Labour brought enormous improvements to the NHS between 1997 and 2010, including:
• 89,000 more nurses and 44,000 more doctors in the NHS, helping to drive up
standards and drive down waits.
• Before 1997 it was not uncommon for patients to wait over 18 months for an
operation – by 2010 Labour guaranteed that nobody need wait more than 18 weeks
• Waiting lists fell by over 500,000 with waiting times at their lowest level since records
began.
• In 1997, 284 000 patients waited more than 6 months for an operation. By 2010 the
figure was almost zero.
• 3 million more operations carried out each year than in 1997.
• The premature mortality rate for cancer the lowest ever recorded, saving nearly 9,000
lives in 2006 compared to 1996.
• Premature mortality from cardiovascular diseases dropped by more than 40 per cent
since 1996, saving nearly 34,000 lives a year.
• The NHS delivered the largest hospital building programme in its history, with 118 new
hospital schemes opened and a further 18 under construction.
• Labour created new services to provide patients with greater convenience including
around 100 new walk-in centres and over 750 one-stop primary care centres.
• By 2010, over three quarters of GP practices offered extended opening hours for at
least one evening or weekend session a week.
• All prescriptions are now free for people being treated for cancer or the effects of
cancer, and teenage girls are offered a vaccination against cervical cancer.
• Labour delivered a guarantee of seeing a cancer specialist within two weeks if your GP
suspects you may have cancer, and guaranteed that whatever your condition, you
would not have to wait more than 18 weeks from GP referral to the start of hospital
treatment – and most waits were much shorter than this.